I just published a paper showing the electron’s mass falls out in closed form from a single phase-lock on a ring, solved from both sides of the same boundary: RLVM (scalar, on R3) and RLTM (vector, on C-space). Both independent routes land at essentially the same number, about 0.51099770 MeV, each ~2.45 ppm below the measured value and comfortably within the <11 ppm envelope set by today’s uncertainty in G.
The same relations invert to a direct value for G ≈ 6.67426728×10⁻11 m³·kg⁻¹·s⁻², with internal consistency far tighter than current lab limits (up to ~a million times in principle). No GR/SR field equations, no tuned parameters—just one lock applied consistently across two spaces. Links and details in the paper if you want to dig into the derivation and the cross-checks.
I just published a paper showing the electron’s mass falls out in closed form from a single phase-lock on a ring, solved from both sides of the same boundary: RLVM (scalar, on R3) and RLTM (vector, on C-space). Both independent routes land at essentially the same number, about 0.51099770 MeV, each ~2.45 ppm below the measured value and comfortably within the <11 ppm envelope set by today’s uncertainty in G.
The same relations invert to a direct value for G ≈ 6.67426728×10⁻11 m³·kg⁻¹·s⁻², with internal consistency far tighter than current lab limits (up to ~a million times in principle). No GR/SR field equations, no tuned parameters—just one lock applied consistently across two spaces. Links and details in the paper if you want to dig into the derivation and the cross-checks.