> Trump appointed Halligan, his former personal attorney, to oversee the case after another US prosecutor, Erik Siebert, resigned. Siebert was reportedly ousted after he told the justice department he had not found sufficient evidence to charge James.
So the exact same story as Comey's prosecution as well? Just install your loyalists and weaponize the DOJ then claim the other party was doing it the whole time!
Well, there's a bit of a difference between using public resources for an ideological goal of your constituents versus for a personal revenge campaign.
The article factually describes behavior by a state prosecutor against a media outlet, it's ruinous financial consequences, and the attempt at doxing their writers. While a victimhood complex is a psychological state of mind.
So can you elaborate what makes the above a "victimhood complex"?
Please look at the publication date before accusing them of lying. The article I linked was published April 3, 2024. VDARE was charged in September 2025 (and suspended work due to the ruinous financial cost of the prosecution in July 2024). So which facts is my article lying about? Or are you simply presuming that the accusation must be true, despite no verdict yet?
Your article mischaracterizes the facts in a way that I sincerely believe could only have been a result of a dishonest party. You might claim that it's the VDARE fraudsters who lied and the publication didn't apply any diligence into actually reading the charges filed or investigating, and simply credulously repeated a story that was contradicted by the facts at the time of their writing. However you want to frame it, there's a kernel of deceit.
> the publication didn't apply any diligence into actually reading the charges filed or investigating
When that article was published, there were no charges filed. It was more than a year later that they were charged. And I'll ask again: which facts were false or mischaracterized? Can you be specific?
The essence of the article I linked was that:
1) Letitia's investigation was drawn out and financially ruinous.
2) She demanded all of their email records, which would have doxxed their writers.
3) The Brimelows are being investigated for using funds donated to their charity for personal expenses, which they deny.
The CNN article, as far as I could tell, contradicts none of these points. But perhaps I missed something?
> Trump appointed Halligan, his former personal attorney, to oversee the case after another US prosecutor, Erik Siebert, resigned. Siebert was reportedly ousted after he told the justice department he had not found sufficient evidence to charge James.
So the exact same story as Comey's prosecution as well? Just install your loyalists and weaponize the DOJ then claim the other party was doing it the whole time!
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71601414/united-states-...
tl:dr; USG is claiming she saved $18,933 over the course the mortgage (in retaliation for NY claiming Trump saved ~450M via fraud).
[flagged]
Well, there's a bit of a difference between using public resources for an ideological goal of your constituents versus for a personal revenge campaign.
Blithering victimhood complex.
The article factually describes behavior by a state prosecutor against a media outlet, it's ruinous financial consequences, and the attempt at doxing their writers. While a victimhood complex is a psychological state of mind.
So can you elaborate what makes the above a "victimhood complex"?
Your article's flat out lying about the facts. https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/03/politics/vdare-brimelow-letit...
Please look at the publication date before accusing them of lying. The article I linked was published April 3, 2024. VDARE was charged in September 2025 (and suspended work due to the ruinous financial cost of the prosecution in July 2024). So which facts is my article lying about? Or are you simply presuming that the accusation must be true, despite no verdict yet?
Your article mischaracterizes the facts in a way that I sincerely believe could only have been a result of a dishonest party. You might claim that it's the VDARE fraudsters who lied and the publication didn't apply any diligence into actually reading the charges filed or investigating, and simply credulously repeated a story that was contradicted by the facts at the time of their writing. However you want to frame it, there's a kernel of deceit.
> the publication didn't apply any diligence into actually reading the charges filed or investigating
When that article was published, there were no charges filed. It was more than a year later that they were charged. And I'll ask again: which facts were false or mischaracterized? Can you be specific?
The essence of the article I linked was that:
1) Letitia's investigation was drawn out and financially ruinous.
2) She demanded all of their email records, which would have doxxed their writers.
3) The Brimelows are being investigated for using funds donated to their charity for personal expenses, which they deny.
The CNN article, as far as I could tell, contradicts none of these points. But perhaps I missed something?
You seem incapable of either speaking or comprehending truth, please let's never speak again.