> One thing we can conclude is that the debunkers, who have been suggesting this is all camera tricks, parallax issues, or people not understanding how videos work, are proven wrong in general, even though they are right about some particular cases. On that point we can move on, as I have been arguing for some while. Mick West is not your proper guide here.
A real god-of-the-gap situation here. "They haven't disproven these specific videos, therefore they are proven wrong in general."
> One thing we can conclude is that the debunkers, who have been suggesting this is all camera tricks, parallax issues, or people not understanding how videos work, are proven wrong in general, even though they are right about some particular cases. On that point we can move on, as I have been arguing for some while. Mick West is not your proper guide here.
A real god-of-the-gap situation here. "They haven't disproven these specific videos, therefore they are proven wrong in general."
or a natural phenomenon we didn't know existed, or a sensor glitch that is very hard to reproduce